• Athletics
  • Big Ed
  • Ed Tech
  • Educators
  • Elections
  • Federal Policy
  • Parents
  • Students
  • The Testing Industry

K-12 News Network's The Wire

K-12 News Network: People-Powered Public Education News

  • Budgets
  • Charter Schools
  • Federal Policy
  • School Districts
  • State Education Law
  • School Boards
You are here: Home / Elections / Unanswered Questions in the Race for California State Superintendent of Public Instruction

Unanswered Questions in the Race for California State Superintendent of Public Instruction

November 1, 2018 by Carl J. Petersen

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

We are largely unable to accept new offers to complete questionnaires”

– Marshall Tuck Campaign

The California Charter School Association and their allies have provided Marshall Tuck with enough cash to flood the airwaves with misleading ads, but with less than a week to go before the election, a whopping 16% of the electorate are still undecided or will not vote on the question of who will become the next California State Superintendent of Public Instruction. This should not be unexpected in a race where the goal has been to obscure the facts in favor of creating fear. It is a favorite tactic of the charter school industry.

Part of Tuck’s strategy is to only appear in controlled environments where he will not have to reveal too much about his history, his supporters or the strategy to privatize our public school system. When asked questions directly, he simply refuses to answer them. He claims to be a progressive Democrat but is receiving the majority of this support from Republicans and appears on slate mailings alongside Gubernatorial candidate John Cox. When the progressive organization, Northridge Indivisible, sent him an endorsement questionnaire in September, his campaign replied that they were “largely unable to accept new offers to complete questionnaires.” His opponent, Tony Thurmond did respond and received the endorsement.

Tuck worships at the Betsy DeVos altar of imagined school-choice, even if it results in a system of separate and unequal education. Given that he wants us to believe that he represents public school children, he should provide voters answers to these questions:

  1. Will you support the NAACP’s call for a moratorium on additional charter schools until the lack of oversight and accountability is addressed.
  2. How will you ensure that charter schools accept all students, including those with Special Education needs?
  3. How will you ensure that charter schools properly spend public funds?
  4. Will you support teachers as they try to build a system that is student-centric?
  5. Will you support students who are LGBTQ+?
  6. Will you take a stand against corruption in our school districts?
  7. Why did you support a CCSA backed candidate who engaged in felonious campaign funding schemes?
  8. Do you support full funding for California students?
  9. Do you support the right of parents to opt their students out of standardized testing?
  10. Do you support the right for all parents, regardless of immigration status, to participate in choosing the School Board Member who will represent them?

Bonus Question: Do you agree with Arne Duncan that Hurricane Katrina was the best thing for the New Orleans’ education system? Will you wait for an earthquake to improve our Public Education system?

Tuck’s campaign was sent these questions. He did not reply.

____________________________________________

Carl Petersen is a parent and special education advocate, elected member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council and was a Green Party candidate in LAUSD’s District 2 School Board race. During the campaign, he was endorsed by Network for Public Education (NPE) Action and Dr. Diane Ravitch called him a “strong supporter of public schools.” His past blogs can be found at www.ChangeTheLAUSD.com. Opinions are his own.

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube

Filed Under: Elections, Uncategorized Tagged With: California, California State Superintendent of Instruction, Marshall Tuck, Tony Thurmond

About Carl J. Petersen

Carl is a parent and special education advocate, elected member of the Northridge East Neighborhood Council and was a Green Party candidate in LAUSD’s District 2 School Board race. During the campaign, he was endorsed by Network for Public Education (NPE) Action and Dr. Diane Ravitch called him a “strong supporter of public schools.” Opinions are his own.

Sign up for our newsletter

* indicates required
Email Format

Buy a hybrid Facebook+ website today!

Federal Policy

Quick Education Voter’s Guide to the California CD34 Race, April 4, 2017

There are twenty-three candidates running to fill former Congressman Xavier Bacerra’s seat in Congressional District 34 in Southern California. (Bacerra is currently the state’s Attorney General, replacing Kamala Harris, who, after November 8, 2016, became our US Senator.) Election Day is Tuesday, April 4, 2017, 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. You can find your polling […]

Betsy DeVos, #NOTMYSDOE

Take the pledge to #resist and fight for public schools as a public good TODAY. DeVos had to have the assistance of Vice President Mike Pence’s unprecedented tie-breaking vote in order to win her confirmation. Two GOP Senators voted against, all Democratic Senators voted against. Yet all the other GOP Senators who received campaign donations […]

Next #DemDebate MUST Include K-12 Education Policy

The next #DemDebate is scheduled for the important primary state of Iowa on November 14, 2015. It’ll be broadcast by CBS in partnership with the Des Moines Register. Professor Julian Vasquez Heilig is leading the call for the families of 50 million students K-12 across the nation and the communities they live in to have […]

More Posts from this Category

K12NN on Blog Talk Radio

Online Politics Progressive Radio at Blog Talk Radio with MOMocrats on BlogTalkRadio

Categories

November 2018
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Oct   Dec »

Copyright © 2022 · The Wire Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in