• Athletics
  • Big Ed
  • Ed Tech
  • Educators
  • Elections
  • Federal Policy
  • Parents
  • Students
  • The Testing Industry

K-12 News Network's The Wire

K-12 News Network: People-Powered Public Education News

  • Budgets
  • Charter Schools
  • Federal Policy
  • School Districts
  • State Education Law
  • School Boards
You are here: Home / Educators / A National NEA Endorsement Vote Now Could Damage State-Level Organizing

A National NEA Endorsement Vote Now Could Damage State-Level Organizing

October 1, 2015 by K12NN Site Admin

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

Loren Scott is active in Los Angeles Democratic Party politics, the NEA, California Teachers Assocation. and a representative to UTLA (United Teachers of Los Angeles). This request is prompted by talk of NEA endorsing Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary which will determine the party’s nominee. A vote on the endorsement could occur as early as this weekend. His previous post on this issue is here. –Ed.

Dear NEA Board members from California,

Please vote NO to an early endorsement for Hillary Clinton.

As an elected CTA/ABC representative serving in both CTA State Council and the NEA Representative Assembly, I consider myself politically pragmatic and understand the positive and negative nuance involved in this endorsement. Despite the emotional impact of angered Sanders supporters, it seems to me what was not considered was how this endorsement would affect California specifically.

Through conversations and emails, I have been in contact with as many as 100 members surrounding this endorsement. From those conversations, I have come to the conclusion that this is not about Clinton or Sanders, it’s about timing and process.

I am quickly learning the average member doesn’t understand the difference between a State PAC and a National one. They are invariably equating your action of endorsement with what we are doing in the State.

In case you don’t know, we in CTA/ABC are beginning a campaign to raise the ABC PAC dues. This is necessary because the amount of money CTA’s political opponents are spending against us are increasing exponentially, and we haven’t increased the amount to fight them in fifteen years. Worse, we at UTLA are in the middle of a dues restructuring campaign of our own that has our members questioning why giving more money is even necessary.

As I promote the increases, members are now saying they will never vote for more dues money that goes toward candidates they don’t necessary support. I try to explain they aren’t connected but many don’t care. They see the NEA’s process as a unilateral action much like AFT’s. A process many of my CTA members felt was clearly biased. Here, those same members feel we are now doing the same thing.

Along similar lines, the members I have talked to all feel that they haven’t had any say in this process. My fellow RA members have reminded me on numerous occasions that we were specifically told that an endorsement wouldn’t happen until Washington’s RA. Then to say the by-laws allows an early endorsement without an RA vote appears deceiving.

Beyond that, with the Friedrichs decision looming over our heads, a decision many feel is more likely to happen than not, we may soon have to enlist our members. I ask how does this endorsement affect our ability to retain our membership? If it affects it in any way, moving forward with the endorsement would be highly problematic.

Let’s be honest, California is clearly split. Even if half the people say they want it and the other half don’t, that should send the clear message that we are highly divided and shouldn’t vote yes. A yes vote would prove to those members that the process is visibly non-inclusive, non-transparent, and would not be representing your constituency.

Please consider the ramifications of what an early endorsement might do to CTA. Do not rubberstamp the endorsement.

Thank you,

Loren Scott

CTA/ABC District J Representative,

NEA Representative Assembly member

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube

Filed Under: Educators, Elections, LAUSD, Lily Eskelsen-Garcia, NEA, Unionism Tagged With: 2016 Elections, Hillary Clinton

About K12NN Site Admin

I'm Cynthia Liu, Owner/Founder of K12 News Network. I'm the proud product of public schools through post-grad, the mom of a child in public schools, and the daughter of two teachers. Connect with me professionally on LinkedIn.

Sign up for our newsletter

* indicates required
Email Format

Buy a hybrid Facebook+ website today!

Federal Policy

Quick Education Voter’s Guide to the California CD34 Race, April 4, 2017

There are twenty-three candidates running to fill former Congressman Xavier Bacerra’s seat in Congressional District 34 in Southern California. (Bacerra is currently the state’s Attorney General, replacing Kamala Harris, who, after November 8, 2016, became our US Senator.) Election Day is Tuesday, April 4, 2017, 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. You can find your polling […]

Betsy DeVos, #NOTMYSDOE

Take the pledge to #resist and fight for public schools as a public good TODAY. DeVos had to have the assistance of Vice President Mike Pence’s unprecedented tie-breaking vote in order to win her confirmation. Two GOP Senators voted against, all Democratic Senators voted against. Yet all the other GOP Senators who received campaign donations […]

Next #DemDebate MUST Include K-12 Education Policy

The next #DemDebate is scheduled for the important primary state of Iowa on November 14, 2015. It’ll be broadcast by CBS in partnership with the Des Moines Register. Professor Julian Vasquez Heilig is leading the call for the families of 50 million students K-12 across the nation and the communities they live in to have […]

More Posts from this Category

K12NN on Blog Talk Radio

Online Politics Progressive Radio at Blog Talk Radio with MOMocrats on BlogTalkRadio

Categories

October 2015
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Sep   Nov »

Copyright © 2022 · The Wire Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in