An LAUSD teacher's key question: why are Title I, II & III funds spent at central district offices instead of directly at underserved schools? If this is true, it seems to violate a legal agreement between LAUSD & the DOE Office of Civil Rights.
LAUSD Should Fund Schools in Need, Not District Offices
www.huffingtonpost.com
Isn't the decision to spend Title I, II, and III money at LAUSD central district offices rather than at school sites in our most under-served communities a clear violation of the 2011 Voluntary Resolution Agreement between LAUSD and the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights?
