• Athletics
  • Big Ed
  • Ed Tech
  • Educators
  • Elections
  • Federal Policy
  • Parents
  • Students
  • The Testing Industry

K-12 News Network's The Wire

K-12 News Network: People-Powered Public Education News

  • Budgets
  • Charter Schools
  • Federal Policy
  • School Districts
  • State Education Law
  • School Boards
You are here: Home / New York City / Go Read It: NYT Editorial, "Fairness in Firing Teachers"

Go Read It: NYT Editorial, "Fairness in Firing Teachers"

March 7, 2011 by K12NN Site Admin

Facebooktwitterredditlinkedinmail

When school budgets shrink, principals and school districts want to be able to reduce the teaching force. (The reasons why there seems to be a perpetual budget crisis when it comes to public education are the subject of whole other blog posts.)

Unions will protect senior faculty because there is a justified fear that the most senior (expensive) teachers will always be the first to go, because beginning teachers start at the bottom of the pay scale and are cheaper to retain.

Schools will want to find a way to eliminate “dead wood”–that small percentage of teaching staff whose ineffectiveness, poor performance, or burned-out approach can’t be tolerated any longer. And while not all of these teachers are the ones who’ve been around longest, when they are, it’s possible to end up firing the least senior under “last hired, first fired” principles.

What’s the fairest way to make these determinations? While education activists agonize over the student dropout rate, there’s increasing concern about the teacher dropout rate–half of newly-minted teachers leave the profession within the first five years. NY’s state legislature has been grappling with these issues for the past few years. The last few bills have failed due to confusing and discredited methods of evaluating teachers.

The NYT’s has taken a stand on the various attempts of the legislature to grapple with this problem. Their position?

The state evaluation system will involve more intensive monitoring and would finally take student performance into account. Teachers would be categorized as highly effective, effective, developing or ineffective. Those who need help would be given it. Those rated ineffective for two consecutive years could be fired. Hearings would last no longer than 60 days.

It will take a Herculean effort to put this system in place. The Legislature should require all districts to subscribe right away, instead of rotating onto it as they negotiate new union contracts, as was specified under last year’s statute. The Legislature must make sure that the scoring system weighs student performance most heavily, so that unfit teachers aren’t allowed to remain on the job by performing well in peripheral areas. Finally, the Legislature must place reasonable limits on the time that teachers can spend appealing unfavorable ratings.

Take a look at the full editorial–what do you think?

And what do we need to do to stop state legislatures from cutting education spending first whenever there’s a budget crisis?

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube

Filed Under: New York City

About K12NN Site Admin

I'm Cynthia Liu, Owner/Founder of K12 News Network. I'm the proud product of public schools through post-grad, the mom of a child in public schools, and the daughter of two teachers. Connect with me professionally on LinkedIn.

Comments

  1. Leonie Haimson says

    March 8, 2011 at 2:33 am

    You should read the column by Mike Winerip in the same paper; points out the absurdity of basing any teacher evaluation system primarily on test scores as this editorial advises.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/education/07win…

    No one can claim to care about teacher quality and base it on such an unfair and unreliable measure.

  2. cynematic says

    March 8, 2011 at 6:13 pm

    Thanks for highighting that article, Leonie.

    There's such an extreme emphasis on measurement and metrics, with test scores seeming to provide "rigor," that other forms of teacher evaluation are ignored. Why, for example, are student evaluations of teachers, teacher peer-review evaluations, portfolio review, and review of classroom management techniques as captured on video not acceptable?

    The overwhelming focus on quantifiable metrics takes the burden off principals and administrators, who should be devising hands-on ways to better coach and assess the teachers they see on a daily basis. Certainly various unions have proposed many of the measures of teacher performance above. It's as if buy-in from teachers and teachers' unions don't matter.

Sign up for our newsletter

* indicates required
Email Format

Buy a hybrid Facebook+ website today!

Federal Policy

Quick Education Voter’s Guide to the California CD34 Race, April 4, 2017

There are twenty-three candidates running to fill former Congressman Xavier Bacerra’s seat in Congressional District 34 in Southern California. (Bacerra is currently the state’s Attorney General, replacing Kamala Harris, who, after November 8, 2016, became our US Senator.) Election Day is Tuesday, April 4, 2017, 7:00 am to 8:00 pm. You can find your polling […]

Betsy DeVos, #NOTMYSDOE

Take the pledge to #resist and fight for public schools as a public good TODAY. DeVos had to have the assistance of Vice President Mike Pence’s unprecedented tie-breaking vote in order to win her confirmation. Two GOP Senators voted against, all Democratic Senators voted against. Yet all the other GOP Senators who received campaign donations […]

Next #DemDebate MUST Include K-12 Education Policy

The next #DemDebate is scheduled for the important primary state of Iowa on November 14, 2015. It’ll be broadcast by CBS in partnership with the Des Moines Register. Professor Julian Vasquez Heilig is leading the call for the families of 50 million students K-12 across the nation and the communities they live in to have […]

More Posts from this Category

K12NN on Blog Talk Radio

Online Politics Progressive Radio at Blog Talk Radio with MOMocrats on BlogTalkRadio

Categories

March 2011
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Feb   Apr »

Copyright © 2022 · The Wire Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in